Should technology know-how be considered a bar for intelligence?
The world is full of technology around us…
Be it the television in front of us or the fridge in our kitchen. Be it the latest microwave to the latest washing machine. Laptops, computers, post-PC devices et al. And of course, the gadget of all gadgets – Mobile.
Saying that we live in a world filled with gadgets small enough to fit in our pockets to Space stations is not an understatement. Everything is gadgets in some form or the other. Microchips have invaded our lives so deep that life without them seems almost as difficult as some of the basic necessities.
The dependence is out in the open with a small failure in working of these gadgets result in losses of the order of millions for companies. This dependence of course means that people who were born before this mayhem need to learn to adjust and the one who are born in the eye of this great storm start fiddling with smart phones and tablets before leaving their diapers. This new generation is so well verse that it seems that people who are not able to tell right from left in a smartphone are essentially baboons who should get training first.
But is it really so? Is knowledge of how to get along with technology a measure for intelligence?
Is a person who is struggling with technology a waste resource and a tech-savvy person a minimum requirement? We have also heard that technology is making us stupid. Is this true?
I believe that the answer to both these questions is one – No.
Because of one simple reason- Knowledge of how to use technology is not a bar for intelligence and should not be used as such. Unfortunately, it is used as such on more than one occasion.
If a person does not know Android he is looked upon as if he is a n00b (a newbie) and a kid. If a person fumbles or struggles with a computer he is of no use. But this is not the case.
With every technology there comes a learning curve and the problem is not the intelligence but the reluctance to follow the learning curve. This process of learning something completely new becomes a tedious process and akin to an uninterested student, the person digresses.
Coming to the second question, this is often raised that technology is making us stupid. There are even numbers sometimes shown to support that. I believe though that the tests are flawed. They still want to test a skill in person that no longer is needed. We are evolving beings and though most evolutions are slow that does not mean that we stop. Technology has given us a method to store information readily at hand. Thus remembering all of it is not a necessity. People now cannot remember more than a few numbers because there is no need for more than that.
Coincidently, the first question is raised by the second group and the second question by the first group. The problem is that we are using a wrong yardstick to measure. Technology, with all its wonders is not difficult enough to challenge mind (yet!) so the question of it being beyond any normal human is laughable. (The inclination is absent not the intelligence). Also, its omnipresence has made remembering a few things obsolete. (Need to memorize is absent not the mind)
Would love to hear your thoughts on this…