Home / Business / Trends / environment / Is a metro rail system the solution to our cities transportation problems?

Is a metro rail system the solution to our cities transportation problems?

Yesterday I happened to read an article about the upcoming Bangalore Metro working to decide the fares between particular stretches of their journey. This got me thinking about a topic which many of us have discussed threadbare.

Is the metro a solution to a city’s transport problems? Is it suited for the Indian context? Does it reduce congestion and pollution as planned? There are hundreds of questions one can think of…

Delhi and Kolkata are the two cities in India which are currently having a metro. The Metro project in Delhi has been one of relative success at least in the public eye.

But interestingly if you go deep down, you realise that the Metro which was initially built for 3 million passengers per day finally carries only 1 million despite cancelling more than 100 bus routes on the journey. It has obviously led to the displacement of more than 200,000 people but only 50,000 have been rehabilitated.

Delhi Metro Rail | Is a metro rail system the solution to our cities transportation problems?

In Bangalore and Hyderabad there have been problems with people complaining that the Metro is affecting the city’s cultural centers by making them weak. Even though there is strong use of blast resistant technology, the problems don’t seem to die down there. There have also been the usual complaints of lack of transparency and no importance being given to environmental issues like the upcoming Mumbai Metro which is still stuck in the cans.

The Pune metro plan is one of utter lack of knowledge of the city’s transport system and population fabric. Without any basic understanding into the functioning of the city’s traffic systems, the plan seems doomed from the start.

For a place like Kochi whose population is expected to reach 6.5 lakhs only by 2026 and which has a very low birth rate, a metro system doesn’t make much sense. Add to that the presence of three national waterways where a strong ferry system can be developed and even a much stronger bus and local train system and you wonder what the powers that be are thinking before pushing such plans forward.

If we see in totality, there are certain basic problems with the metro system. It is sadly never ever considered together in partnership with the other transport systems like bus, train etc. The reasons for implementing the system though good on paper actually becomes a means to start it at rather than discuss with the general public about implementing such a system.

The environmental sensitivity required while implementing such a project is rarely done with care and concern rather it becomes another activity in the entire list. The metro system in many cities has over-ridden the bus routes. But little or no justification is given for the same. It has also been seen that many a time the metro corridor has become property development routes rather than transportation routes.

Cities in Europe built metros in the 20th century because they had centralized business districts. Do we? The cost estimates have escalated over the years with poor revenue collection. All in all the hurried planning of the metro system leaves a lot to be desired.

Until such issues are solved, the educated individual won’t be fooled into believing the happy headlines about Metro carrying millions of passengers every day.

Your thoughts welcome !

Bangalore metro Delhi Metro Hyderabad metro Metro Rail system Pune metro transportation transportation facility
Previous: Marketing Research brings only incremental changes…
Next: Shale Gas: The Dark Knight in Shining Armor?

About Aseem Rastogi

Aseem Rastogi is a keen social media enthusiast, an aspiring novelist and an avid blogger. You can follow him on  his blog or twitter.

19 comments

  1. Dini Satheesan

    plus floating population too.

  2. Dini Satheesan

    As of 2011, Kochi had a metropolitan area population of 2,117,990, that means 2.1 millions. Source:Wikipedia

  3. thus any one know about the hydrogen super highway.

  4. No its not a solution..

  5. nice

  6. While the metro may reduce the traffic problems in our cities, my bigger concern is the huge risk it poses. We have already seen cracks in the Bangalore metro pillars and support columns even during construction. I am sure they have used poor quality concrete and other materials. Pictures were published in the newspapers here. God only knows what sort of safety features (or lack of) they will implement in the trains themselves. Who knows, the doors may automatically open when the train is traveling high up on the tracks between two stations? I cannot begin to imagine how many hundreds or thousands of crores were eaten up by corrupt babus and politicians. I won’t be surprised if a section of the metro and the tracks come crashing down after a few years.

  7. sir,metro rail of hyderabad will change the life of people in the city. there is traffic congestion becoz of only rtc buses.they there is no any traffic rule for rtc drivers.one day stop the rtc buses,yuo will find roads are desserted.people of hyderabad will get relief from errant auto drivers.

  8. The facts are blatantly wrong in this article. As of now, Delhi Metro carries 1.6 million passengers, not 1 million as you are spreading a lie here. Also new routes are being added and the passengers numbers also add up whenever new lines/sections are open. When Delhi Metro project will be completed, it will have 3 million ridership. You are finding faults in Delhi Metro which is among the most profitable systems in the world because you are against anything done by government, what is your comment on mumbai metro which is doomed ever since it started in private hands. All mumbai metro plans to do is to delay and escalate the cost of the project.

    • First thing first, I have taken my points regarding this article from a report tabled by Parisar – An NGO based in Pune in consultation with many top bodies. http://www.parisar.org/images/publications/report.pdf As for the your point about me saying anything against the government, I think you need to not assume things randomly. If I feel something is wrong, it maybe wrong. And I guess there is no harm to question the government in that way, is there? And neways that’s what a democracy allows one to do, right? As for the Mumbai metro I have said the following “There have also been the usual complaints of lack of transparency and no importance being given to environmental issues like the upcoming Mumbai Metro which is still stuck in the cans.” So before making any comments, please read my post carefully that I don’t support or am against the private sector or the government. If something is wrong, it maybe wrong. As for the Delhi Metro passenger numbers it was as per 2010 at least because this report is tabled in June 2010. If I were to take your point of 1.6 million travellers its still way below the 3 million mark the Delhi Metro had been constructed for. And in such a case, tell me how will it be cash positive. Sir, its very easy to believe what Sreedharan or Shiela Dixit or anyone else says. Sometimes I guess one needs to check out the facts too.

      • Yes, it is very important to check facts. 1) Delhi Metro as per figures released in November 2010 has passed daily ridership of 1.6 million passengers. 2) Delhi Metro has four phases. So far Phase 1 and Phase 2 are completed and they have reached 1.6 million passengers. Phase 3 is under progress now and after that Phase -4 will be built. After phase-4, the daily ridership will cross even 3-4 million mark. Having said that, I dont want to make it delhi issue as this article was meant about problems in our whole country. I still think that daily up-down people, women, students coming from small towns on the periphery of a big city ofter get crowded EMU trains or buses. something should be done in that regard. Example palwal-delhi local, aligarh-delhi local, dahanu road-mira road-mumbai. or you can see extremely crowded unreserved second class compartments of long distance trains. Europe has a very high frequency of trains. in UK I can find a long distance train also every 10-15 minutes. USA has excellent roads.

        • Ok fine I agree to your point. Probably your figures and facts are right to back up your claims. Anyway my entire article was not on Delhi, it was generally about how metro system may not work in the country.

  9. Delhi might have missed 3 million target, but in terms of revenue that is passenger-kilometers it is matching estimates, as told by sridharan. This is because people travel longer distances more in metro than short distances.

    • The question here is what you want to know. Sreedharan has definitely done very good work. But if the project was done with an initial estimation of 3 million and obviously costs incurred would have been based on that. And add to that the loss of revenues from cancelling more than 100 bus routes. And in the end if you have just 1 million travelling, how can you tell me that the railways are cash positive?

  10. there is no one solution to the traffic problem in our cities. moving people from their personal 4wheel/2wheel drives to a public transport should be the target. The aim should not be to move everyone from the roads to metro. Even a 30-40% move to public transport can give a huge respite from the traffic gridlocks and the pollution.

    • Yeah and in that transportation system, the Metro should be a part not the only part! It should be integrated with BRTS, local trains etc.

  11. Fairly Mr. Rastogi, you have not attempted to gather facts before writing this. Kochi Metro was proposed by DMRC after making a careful economic and technical feasibility study. It is expected to cater to 3 million population of Kochi’s metropolitan area. The number 6 lakhs is the population of Kochi corporation . Kochi corporation has not been expanded for 40 years for political reasons of gerrymander and has no correlation with the city’s de facto limits. It is a fair guess that you took your facts from wikipedia or such sites which are arbitrarily edited and manipulated and makes your analysis which otherwise could have carried some weight less of worth.

    • Mr Janardhan I have referred a report by Parisar – An NGO working in Pune for this article. And regarding Wikipedia I would like to bring to your notice that it is the largest online sources of information on the planet today. Probably I think you have got to read a lot of poorly edited information and that’s why you don’t seem to like it. As for the information regarding Kochi in the report I am putting it here – Kochi The Kochi experience with metro systems was presented by Mr. K. J. Sohan (INTACH and former Mayor, Kochi). This presentation was particularly interesting considering the demographics of the city and its likely growth patterns. Kochi city currently has a population of under 6 lakhs and even the urban agglomeration including many villages around Kochi only has a population of about Rs. 11 lakhs. Moreover, Kochi is also the fi rst city in India to have a birth rate that is below the replacement level and therefore its population is not expected to grow fast either, and the city’s population is only expected to reach about 6.5 lakhs (and 14 lakhs for the agglomeration) in 2026! Therefore, it was surprising that the city proposed a metro rail as a solution to its transport problems. The concession agreement was such that it would actually be profi table for the concessionaire to abandon the agreement at some point and pay the penalty to walk away from the scheme, since the penalty was an insuffi cient deterrent. The process of awarding the metro rail contract in Hyderabad was extremely opaque. Not only were citizens not privy to the details of the bidding process and concession agreement, even legislators of the Andhra Pradesh assembly were not aware of them! 5 Mr. Sohan also pointed out that Kerala was blessed with rivers and canals, and had 3 national waterways running through it which are extensively in use as transport corridors even now. It is estimated that the modernization and improvement of the ferry systems – currently being neglected – present in 12 of the 16 urban local bodies (ULBs) would take only about Rs. 100 crores. Similarly, he said there had been a proposal to improve the surface train system, which would also have costed in the region of Rs. 100 crores. In contrast, the proposed metro system would cost Rs. 5000 crores. Moreover, the proposed metro rail route runs parallel to existing railway lines on which suburban trains can be easily run. As a result, he pointed out that the fares for the proposed metro rail system would be considerably higher than the fares for the existing bus, suburban rail and ferry systems. The Kochi metro proposal also appears to go against many of the directives and guidelines of the Central Government and its offi cials, said Mr. Sohan. Mr. Jaipal Reddy, the urban development minister, said the Kochi metro is likely to be a white elephant, while Mr. Gajendra Haldea of the Planning Commission felt that a publicly funded metro system was not practical. Moreover, the Central Government guidelines state that metro systems are intended for cities with populations of at least 3 million (30 lakhs). Therefore, a metro rail proposal for Kochi (and cities such as Ludhiana, Chandigarh and perhaps Jaipur) clearly goes against the guidelines of the Central Government. Since the media in Kochi seems fascinated by the metro, Mr. Sohan and his team have been holding regular interactions with citizens in order to apprise them of the cost and implications of the metro, and its likely impact on the city of Kochi. The website is – http://www.parisar.org/images/publications/report.pdf I am sure you may have questions on why to believe an NGO. Its your prerogative. I personally have a lot of reservations against the Metro system and that’s why I chose to research on this topic.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

who's online