Google, Yahoo and Microsoft sued by Indian Supreme Court for displaying gender selection advertisements

by Arun Prabhudesai on August 14, 2008

The age old controversy remains. Who is responsible for showing banned advertisements? Is it the Ad platform or the person who is advertising on that platform? In my book it is the latter, however Indian Supreme court thinks otherwise. They have slapped notices to Google, Yahoo and Microsoft for displaying gender selection advertisements targeted at Indian users.

The advertisement of products and techniques to aid in the selection of an unborn child’s sex is an offense under India’s “The Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act”.

According to the petitioner, Sabu Matthew George, search engines, video sharing sites and social networking sites, including Google’s Orkut and YouTube have been displaying these objectionable ads. [CW]

The law books hold network service providers liable unless they can prove that the offense or contravention was committed without their knowledge or that they had exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission of such offense or contravention.

Now the question is, can Google scrape through each and every advertisement to find out whether it is displaying objectionable content? Absolutely not !

Although, the advertiser has to accept and abide by the terms and conditions during signing up with these ad platforms, it is extremely difficult for giant like Google to find out who is breaching the terms.

This is an interesting debate and I would love to hear what readers feel about it.

Share & Bookmark
[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [LinkedIn] [StumbleUpon] [Twitter] [Yahoo!] [Email]
PG

Author: Arun Prabhudesai

Arun Prabhudesai is founder / chief editor at trak.in. He jumped the Entrepreneurship bandwagon in early 2008 after a long 13 year stint in I.T Industry. You can follow him on twitter @trakin or get in touch with him at admin-at-trak-dot-in or 91.9822575676.
Google, Yahoo and Microsoft sued by Indian Supreme Court for displaying gender selection advertisements

Related posts:

  1. Microsoft and Yahoo to go after Google with Bing
  2. Microsoft bullying Yahoo : Ready to talk only with new board
  3. Surprise…Surprise ! Yahoo more popular than Google in Social Media !
  4. Yahoo follows Google with oneSearch SMS.
  5. The new look Microsoft!
  6. Indian TV advertisements: Very Creative and funny?
  7. Tata Indicom to show forced advertisements on your mobile ?
  8. Sunday Fun: Indian TV advertisements
  9. A joke of a deal – Yahoo Twitter Integration !
  10. Hottest Indian Startups : Slmbk – Indian facebook?

Enter your email ID to get similar articles in your inbox free

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

1 xyz August 17, 2008 at 1:52 am

Well I have worked for a few months in Yahoo before and I would like to point out that due care is taken to see to it that spam and objectionable advertisements are not displayed on the websites.. There is an exhaustive checklist (obviously automated) to ensure the same and all online ads are subjected to it before being displayed.. So in a way by not detecting the malicious ad, there seems to some loop hole in the system… If this has happened due to negligence by Yahoo or Google or Microsoft, in my opinion they should be liable.. Otherwise they must be let off with due warning to improve their system..

Coming to the broader question, I believe that nowadays millions of websites, blogs, portals are popping up with no regard to authencity of content.. There is increase in spam, porn ads, undesirable pop ups and some are even accused of obtaining confidential data for henious crimes.. I believe that the cyber laws have to become stricter and regulations have to be strengthened to ensure that all websites (including personal ones) follow the basic diligence and ensure minimum quality standards..

Reply

2 shrimpy August 17, 2008 at 3:41 pm

Is this part of a larger  Indian legal bias against the web? Both this case and the ruckus in 2004 over the DPS mobile phone video on bazee.com have echoes of shooting the messenger.

Reply

3 Prabhu August 20, 2008 at 1:58 am

I think this is a bold move from our court. You cannot display any arbitrary ad in a TV just because you are getting money, isn’t it? Same way, even these portals should have stricter ways to check the ads (automated/manual/outsourced whatever).Kudos to supreme court.

Reply

4 Neeraj June 4, 2009 at 3:20 pm

Being myself a employed in a network, managing the publisher business, It remains the onus of the network/service provider to run quality ads, even though it is self serving.

Reply

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Previous post:

Next post:

who's online